<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CandyRecapper: Snark + candy = love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.candyrecapper.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.candyrecapper.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:37:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pillow Mints v. Tic-Tacs by Abra</title>
		<link>http://www.candyrecapper.com/pillow-mints-v-tic-tacs/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Abra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candyrecapper.com/?p=41#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I agree with you wholeheartedly about both types of mints.  I don&#039;t think of Tic-Tacs as candy, though.  I think of them as long-distance driving wake-up pills.  That&#039;s how I use them, exclusively.  CRUNCH, zing, I&#039;m awake for a while longer.  Pillow mints, though, just as you describe.  Mmmm, I want some pillow mints.  

PS, though... I always felt that orange Tic-Tacs were just wrong.  Not minty.  Not orange tasting.  Just wrong.  I am faithful to the plain white ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you wholeheartedly about both types of mints.  I don&#8217;t think of Tic-Tacs as candy, though.  I think of them as long-distance driving wake-up pills.  That&#8217;s how I use them, exclusively.  CRUNCH, zing, I&#8217;m awake for a while longer.  Pillow mints, though, just as you describe.  Mmmm, I want some pillow mints.  </p>
<p>PS, though&#8230; I always felt that orange Tic-Tacs were just wrong.  Not minty.  Not orange tasting.  Just wrong.  I am faithful to the plain white ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Testamints by Pillow Mints v. Tic-Tacs &#124; CandyRecapper: Snark + candy = love</title>
		<link>http://www.candyrecapper.com/testamints/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Pillow Mints v. Tic-Tacs &#124; CandyRecapper: Snark + candy = love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candyrecapper.com/?p=18#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] Pillow mints are as pillowy and soft and delightful as their name implies. They&#8217;re fluffy and sweet like angel wings. Like chewing on a delicious angel&#8217;s wings. When I was at that all-important age when you can hold even a tic-tac in awe, pillow mints were just about at the top of my candy pantheon. They do this magical thing where they are first firm and chewy and then they melt invisibly away in your mouth. You don&#8217;t even have to chew them; they&#8217;ll dissolve on their own. You get every texture out of them! Plus they taste good! And the pillow mint category includes the hilariously kitsch Testamints! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pillow mints are as pillowy and soft and delightful as their name implies. They&#8217;re fluffy and sweet like angel wings. Like chewing on a delicious angel&#8217;s wings. When I was at that all-important age when you can hold even a tic-tac in awe, pillow mints were just about at the top of my candy pantheon. They do this magical thing where they are first firm and chewy and then they melt invisibly away in your mouth. You don&#8217;t even have to chew them; they&#8217;ll dissolve on their own. You get every texture out of them! Plus they taste good! And the pillow mint category includes the hilariously kitsch Testamints! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pixy Stix v. Pop Rocks by Dani</title>
		<link>http://www.candyrecapper.com/pixy-stix-v-pop-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candyrecapper.com/?p=38#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Whoops! Thanks - fixed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops! Thanks &#8211; fixed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pixy Stix v. Pop Rocks by Bunting</title>
		<link>http://www.candyrecapper.com/pixy-stix-v-pop-rocks/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candyrecapper.com/?p=38#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Just FYI, Keckler wrote today&#039;s entry, not I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just FYI, Keckler wrote today&#8217;s entry, not I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pez v. Sugar Daddy/Babies and Slo-Poke by CandyRecapper: Snark + candy = love &#187; Blog Archive &#187; N Candy AA</title>
		<link>http://www.candyrecapper.com/pez-v-sugar-daddybabies-and-slo-poke/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>CandyRecapper: Snark + candy = love &#187; Blog Archive &#187; N Candy AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candyrecapper.com/?p=30#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] So for your amusement, I&#8217;m going to try to recap each candy in this round. We&#8217;ve got Pez v. Sugar Daddy/Babies and Slo-Poke; Pixy Stix v. Pop Rocks (awesome!!); Pillow Mints (LOVE) v. Tic-Tacs; Nerds v. Bottlecaps; Peeps v. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So for your amusement, I&#8217;m going to try to recap each candy in this round. We&#8217;ve got Pez v. Sugar Daddy/Babies and Slo-Poke; Pixy Stix v. Pop Rocks (awesome!!); Pillow Mints (LOVE) v. Tic-Tacs; Nerds v. Bottlecaps; Peeps v. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

